Free Web Hosting by Netfirms
Web Hosting by Netfirms | Free Domain Names by Netfirms

Saturday, 30th June 2007

The Red Square & Rectangle nebulae, SN1987A, SN2006gy, η Carinae and their ilk.

 

How does a reality without supersymmetry, tachyons and imaginary time look, feel, taste and sound, please?

“Bet you look good on the dance-floor, …”, Arctic Monkeys, 2007

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OVYzeUvuc6Q&mode=related&search=  and alikes

Bikerman@frihost (Chris Snowdon): light cone & tachyon :

An infinitely heavy object (sphere in 3-space) of radius r travelling at c is available too further down the topic. 

The models of GR4 and quantised SU(10 & 11) are on very much finer scale, they are capable to explain the image below…

The Red Square nebula (30.8 seconds of arc per side of image above) may be embedded in a 1 light year-sized nebula that puts it ~400 light years from here*. Peter Tuthill and James Lloyd** have started to describe the detailed structure…

Red Square model

The animation (first frame above) is used to compare the Red Square nebula with the rings seen around supernova 1987a. Follow link 2 for full ani-gif.

SN1987A, HST

The Red Rectangle nebula has rungs at approximately 300 year intervals for the past 1.4 thousand years.

and now we have comparisons between η Carinae and SN 2006gy to make…

 Chandra, 18th September 2006

APOD 10th May 2007 SN2006gy::

SN2006gy

 illustration @ wikipedia

HST view of η Carinae’s 1843-born, lobes of nickel, weighing-in at 40 Solar masses (~1032 kg) as they looked on 10th June 1996. UMN/NASA (click image for full picture)

The remaining 100, or so, solar-mass object located centrally here could convert all its matter to a single gamma photon (stretching Einstein’s Special theory of 1905 to its limits). As a result, 1.8 x1048 joules (J) of energy would be released (Nathan Smith et al, have 1051 ergs = 1044 joules released at SN2006gy). By comparison, Sol converts enough material to energy in its fusion reactor core to source ~1031 J. The Chandrasekhar limit of electron degeneracy is within the central pixel and is estimated to be a few solar masses. (Gulp! I’ll have to get a move-on with regard to event-timing…)

Sol outputs 1365 ± 1 Watt per metre squared of its surface. That surface occupies a colander-like hole in Earthly space-time. Earth’s distance to Sol is ~ 1.5x1011 metres (about 100 million miles). The reported distance to the Carina nebula by parallax methods* is 2.7 kpc (7500 ± 500 light years, ~1020 metres).

Double the separation, quarter the apparent source intensity: increase it by a factor of 109 and the intensity drops by a factor 1018. Hence, 1048/ 1018 ~ 1030 and of the order 1/10th Solar output will arrive here in an instant of time measured in Planck units of proper time.

Without such an impulse, a ‘second moon’ will appear to shine for a few years, or so, from a point source(?!) in the southern hemisphere sky. Latitudes below 60 south will see it 24/7, weather permitting. (Updated Thursday 28th June 2007)

Do any of the current GCM’s include such chaotic variability (e.g. Figure 1) in their ‘radiative forcings’?

* http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/abs/10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06186.x?cookieSet=1&journalCode=mnr

 

The luminous intensity of η Car. Is about to follow that seen at SN2006gy (T+350 days since pop).

Altitude: 56:44; Azimuth -59:30 (…to be improved.)

Magnitude 5.0 ± 0.2

 

Figure 1: Source energies at η Carinae, SN2006gy & Sol as these hypernovae evolve.

P.S. How do I calculate if shelter inside this bean would be sufficient, please?

Conclusion: It probably won’t.

“Always look on the bright side.” ? ! L

However, Brian C. Thomas, Adrian L. Melott, Brian D. Fields, and Barbara J. Anthony-Twarog

see no threat from η Carinae if there’s no grb.

 

References

·        http://www.feedshow.com/show_items-feed=654c95aaf07fb20a51d4e3a07ab7372a

·        http://www.physics.usyd.edu.au/~gekko/redsquare.html

·        http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/astro-ph/pdf/0612/0612617v3.pdf

·        1 Joule (SI, J) of energy = 107 (ten million) ergs. On Earth, 1 J is the energy required to move 1 kilogramme through a distance of 1 metre without friction.

·        http://66.102.9.104/search?q=cache:MsGD8qIbdscJ:arxiv.org/pdf/0705.4274+sn2006gy,+gamma+ray+burst&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=9

So, when temperatures approach Planck-scale, T~1032 K :: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck_units, gamma-photon pair-production :: γ -> e- e+ H, where H is the total recoil energy (Hamiltonian) of this interaction :: leads to the instantaneous creation of a spherical-lens-like, Ricci tensor driven shell of visible material*. I mean, it’s like a fairground trick with mirrors: it looks a lot bigger than it is.

 

* For an example in darker material, see HST’s latest view of such a lens ::

An older nebula aligned with a more remote galaxy ::

http://www.spacetelescope.org/

From Einstein’s postulate on c: Any gravitomagnetic1 radiation from η Carinae’s next blow will arrive in near-simultaneity with the brightest flash.

How do the latest2 Pulsar models work with a 1032 kilogramme binary system spinning at gigahertz, say?

Joseph Ndururi, 20053, Thesis on gravitomagnetism. ‘Masse current’, dm/dt. This model takes some of the energy of interaction of 2 (or more) gravitational fields and emits it as a ‘masse current’ perpendicular to the rotation plane. It is achieved by an addition to Newton that is all-but zero until relative motions approach c.

For η Carinae, this current helps but, by how much….?

Also, regarding quantum gravity theory (e.g. Ian Consterdine, 20044), the emissions from sn2006gy shed more light.

Theory: c à c f(E)

Predicts:

The highest energy photons, emitted at sn2006gy arrived at Chandra some time after lower energy photons (created in near-co-located space-time around the burst) arrived at Spitzer. Comparisons between the light curves of other supernovae and sn2006gy are more than illuminating.

Wikipedia, or click image for more detail.

Chandra update: Monday, 17th June 2007 ::

http://spaceflightnow.com/news/n0705/07supernova/

 

Later: it all goes white.

All of this frame. All of it for 100 million seconds, or so. That’s about 3 years.

This is how it goes::

Standard warnings anent, “NEVER LOOK DIRECTLY AT SOL.” Apply manifold with η Car.

Dear observers:
                      Eta Carinae is now at its brightest state since the
end of 19th century's eruption. Although the current state is not an
outburst but a normal S Doradus phase on its way up, this is very
interesting to note.
                      The star is currently at 5.0-5.1 magnitudes and it
will probably continue to brighten for several weeks more.
                      As we all know the star is very difficult to measure
both photometrically and visually due to the envelope that surrounds it and
the emission lines present. My visual observations have been 0.1 mag.
fainter than the PEP(V) values presented in the past by Stan Walker so now
that I observe it at 5.1 it's probably at 5.0. Three other observers (Enzo
de Bernardini, Cecilia Scalia and Conrado Kurtz) have also been observing
the star between 5.0 and 5.2 so the rising trend is confirmed.
                       Will eta Carinae finally get closer to 4th magnitude?
 
Cheers,
Sebastian.

http://vsnet.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp/vsnet/Mail/chat4000/msg00649.html

 

 

References

1 see, e.g. Gravity Probe B and its manoeuvres. June 2007, results expected by December 2007 but Einstein holds to 1% so far… J

2 e.g. LISA, Durham Cosmology, Santa Cruz, Beijing, Bombay, Sydney, Auckland etc…

3 Joseph Ndururi, 2005 :: http://site.voila.fr/blackholethermodyn and http://site.voila.fr/blackholethermodyn/gravilaws.pdf

4 http://newolder.netfirms.com/upper%20f%20for%20em%20radiation.htm

Ian E. Consterdine, Tuesday 19th June 2007

Photograph by Melodee Hill.